Files
modbison/docs/architecture/content_moderation.md
T

427 lines
17 KiB
Markdown
Raw Blame History

This file contains ambiguous Unicode characters
This file contains Unicode characters that might be confused with other characters. If you think that this is intentional, you can safely ignore this warning. Use the Escape button to reveal them.
# Content Moderation & Age Verification Architecture
> **Status:** Proposed
> **Owner:** Platform team
> **Related:** Server authority + client prediction, avatar component system, backend auth (JWT)
## 1. Overview
This document specifies the **content moderation** and **age verification**
architecture for **agp-game**, a Godot-based multiplayer game built by
autonomous agents. It defines:
- How **content flags** propagate through the system across the three primary
content types: **assets**, **rooms**, and **scripts**.
- How flags are **evaluated, aggregated, and enforced** at load time, at
runtime, and at the network boundary.
- The **age verification flow**, combining a lightweight **self-declaration**
with an optional **ID check hook** for higher-assurance verification.
The goal is a **single, consistent moderation pipeline** that applies the same
rules to user-generated content (UGC) regardless of whether it is a 3D asset, a
room definition, or a script, and that gates access to mature content behind a
verifiable age gate.
### 1.1 Design Goals
- **Uniformity:** One flag vocabulary and one propagation mechanism across
assets, rooms, and scripts.
- **Composability:** Flags on a room aggregate the flags of the assets and
scripts it contains; flags on a world aggregate the flags of its rooms.
- **Enforcement at the boundary:** The server is authoritative for what content
a client may load or receive, mirroring the server-authoritative networking
model.
- **Privacy-preserving age checks:** Self-declaration requires no PII; the ID
check hook is optional, pluggable, and never stores raw identity documents.
- **Auditability:** Every flag decision is logged with a reason, an actor, and
a timestamp so moderation actions are reviewable.
---
## 2. Content Flag Vocabulary
All content carries a set of **content flags**. A flag is a typed, immutable
label with a **severity** and a **scope**. Flags are the atomic unit of
moderation; everything else (aggregation, enforcement, gating) operates on
flags.
### 2.1 Flag Definition
A flag is a structured record:
| Field | Type | Description |
|------------|-----------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| `id` | `string` | Stable machine-readable identifier, e.g. `violence.gore`. |
| `label` | `string` | Human-readable name, e.g. "Graphic Gore". |
| `category` | `enum` | One of `violence`, `sexual`, `language`, `substance`, `gambling`, `horror`, `hate`, `custom`. |
| `severity` | `enum` | One of `none`, `mild`, `moderate`, `severe`. |
| `scope` | `enum` | One of `visual`, `audio`, `text`, `behavior`, `interaction`. |
| `mature` | `bool` | Whether this flag triggers the age gate (see §5). |
| `reason` | `string` | Free-text justification supplied by the flagger. |
| `source` | `enum` | One of `author`, `moderator`, `automated`, `community`. |
### 2.2 Canonical Flag Set
The platform defines a **canonical registry** of flags so that different
content types and different flaggers use the same vocabulary. Examples:
| id | category | severity | scope | mature |
|-----------------------------|------------|-----------|--------------|--------|
| `violence.none` | violence | none | visual | false |
| `violence.mild` | violence | mild | visual | false |
| `violence.gore` | violence | severe | visual | true |
| `sexual.suggestive` | sexual | mild | visual | true |
| `sexual.explicit` | sexual | severe | visual | true |
| `language.mild` | language | mild | text | false |
| `language.profanity` | language | moderate | text | false |
| `substance.references` | substance | mild | text | false |
| `gambling.simulated` | gambling | moderate | behavior | true |
| `horror.jumpscare` | horror | mild | audio/visual | false |
| `hate.hateful` | hate | severe | text | true |
The registry is **data-driven** (a JSON/YAML manifest shipped with the server)
so new flags can be added without code changes.
---
## 3. Flag Propagation Model
Flags propagate through the system along the **content dependency graph**. The
three content types form a hierarchy:
```
World
└── Room
├── Asset (mesh, texture, audio, animation, material)
└── Script (behavior, dialogue, event logic)
```
### 3.1 Propagation Rules
1. **Explicit flags** are set directly on a content item by its author or a
moderator.
2. **Inherited flags** flow upward: a room's effective flag set is the **union**
of its own explicit flags and the flags of every asset and script it
references.
3. **Aggregation** uses the **maximum severity** per category across all
contributing items. A room containing one `violence.gore` asset and one
`violence.none` asset is `violence.severe`.
4. **Maturity is monotonic:** if any contributing item is `mature`, the
containing room and world are `mature`.
5. **Cycles are impossible** by construction: content references form a DAG
(an asset cannot contain a room; a room cannot contain itself).
### 3.2 Propagation Through the Pipeline
Flags are attached at **authoring time** and carried through every stage:
```
Authoring ──► Upload ──► Validation ──► Storage ──► Distribution ──► Runtime
│ │ │ │ │ │
│ flag │ flag │ automated │ flag │ flag │ flag
│ declared │ preserved │ scan adds │ indexed │ re-checked │ enforced
│ │ │ flags │ │ │
```
| Stage | Responsibility |
|--------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| **Authoring**| Author declares flags in the editor/upload UI. |
| **Upload** | Flags are validated against the canonical registry; unknown flags rejected. |
| **Validation**| Automated scanner (hash-based + heuristic) adds flags for detected content. |
| **Storage** | Flags are stored alongside the content record and indexed for queries. |
| **Distribution**| Flags are re-checked against the current registry before serving. |
| **Runtime** | The client enforces flags before loading content (see §4). |
### 3.3 Data Model
Flags are stored as a **normalized join table** so they can be queried and
aggregated efficiently:
```
content_item (id, type, owner_id, ...)
content_flag (content_id, flag_id, source, reason, created_at, actor_id)
flag_registry (id, category, severity, scope, mature, ...)
```
Aggregation is computed by a SQL view / query that joins a content item's
transitive dependencies. Because the graph is a DAG, this is a bounded
recursive query (PostgreSQL `WITH RECURSIVE`).
---
## 4. Enforcement
Enforcement happens at three layers, in order:
### 4.1 Load-Time Enforcement (Server)
Before a client is allowed to **request** content, the server evaluates the
content's effective flag set against the requesting account's **content
preferences** and **age verification status**:
- If the content is `mature` and the account is **not age-verified**, the
request is **rejected** with a `403 MATURE_CONTENT_REQUIRES_VERIFICATION`.
- If the content's flags exceed the account's **content filter** (a per-account
severity threshold per category), the request is rejected or the offending
content is **stripped** (e.g., audio muted, mesh hidden, script not loaded).
### 4.2 Runtime Enforcement (Client)
The client receives a **manifest** of allowed content from the server. It never
loads content that is not in the manifest. This prevents a malicious or buggy
client from bypassing the server's filter by loading content directly.
- Assets not in the manifest are **not instantiated**.
- Scripts not in the manifest are **not executed**.
- Rooms not in the manifest are **not entered**.
### 4.3 Network Boundary Enforcement
The server **filters replication** based on flags:
- Mature or filtered content is **not replicated** to clients that cannot
receive it.
- A room's flag set is broadcast in the room metadata so clients can show a
warning before entry.
### 4.4 Enforcement Decision Flow
```
Client requests content C for account A
│
▼
Compute effective flags F(C) [union + max-severity aggregation]
│
▼
Is A age-verified? ──no──► Is F(C).mature? ──yes──► REJECT (403)
│ yes │ no
▼ ▼
Does F(C) exceed A's filter? ──► yes ──► REJECT or STRIP
│ no
▼
Serve content + manifest
```
---
## 5. Age Verification Flow
Age verification is a **two-tier** system:
- **Tier 1 — Self-declaration:** The user asserts their date of birth. This is
fast, requires no PII beyond a birthdate, and is sufficient for most content.
- **Tier 2 — ID check (optional hook):** A pluggable identity-verification
provider confirms the user is an adult. This raises the account's assurance
level and unlocks the highest maturity tier.
### 5.1 Verification States
An account has an **age verification status**:
| Status | Meaning |
|-------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------|
| `unverified` | No declaration on file. |
| `self_declared` | User declared a birthdate; **not** independently confirmed. |
| `id_verified` | User passed the ID check hook; independently confirmed adult. |
| `rejected` | ID check failed or declaration was inconsistent. |
### 5.2 Tier 1 — Self-Declaration Flow
```
User submits { date_of_birth }
│
▼
Server validates format & plausibility (age 13–120, not in future)
│
▼
Compute age from DOB
│
▼
age >= 18 ──► status = self_declared (adult)
age >= 13 ──► status = self_declared (minor, restricted)
age < 13 ──► status = rejected (below minimum platform age)
```
- The DOB is stored **encrypted at rest** and is **never exposed** to other
players.
- A user may **upgrade** from `self_declared` to `id_verified` at any time via
Tier 2.
### 5.3 Tier 2 — ID Check Hook
The ID check is an **optional, pluggable hook**. The platform defines an
interface; concrete providers (e.g., a third-party KYC service) implement it.
```
User requests ID verification
│
▼
Server creates a verification session (idempotent, expiring)
│
▼
Server calls provider hook: verify(identity_token) -> { adult: bool, ref: string }
│
▼
adult == true ──► status = id_verified, store provider ref (not raw doc)
adult == false ─► status = rejected
provider error ──► status unchanged, retry allowed
```
**Privacy guarantees:**
- The platform **never stores** the raw identity document or image.
- Only the provider's **opaque reference** and the boolean `adult` result are
persisted.
- The hook is **asynchronous and idempotent**; a session can be retried without
double-charging or double-verifying.
### 5.4 Hook Interface
The ID check hook is defined as a backend interface (FastAPI dependency /
abstract service):
```python
class IdentityVerificationProvider(Protocol):
def create_session(self, user_id: str) -> VerificationSession: ...
def verify(self, session_id: str, identity_token: str) -> VerificationResult: ...
class VerificationResult:
adult: bool
provider_ref: str | None
error: str | None
```
A default **no-op provider** returns `adult=False` with a clear error, so the
system runs without any third-party integration until one is configured.
### 5.5 Age Gate Enforcement
The age gate is enforced at **load time** (see §4.1):
| Verification status | Can access `mature` content? |
|---------------------|------------------------------|
| `unverified` | No |
| `self_declared` | Yes (adult) / No (minor) |
| `id_verified` | Yes |
| `rejected` | No |
---
## 6. Moderation Workflow
### 6.1 Flagging Sources
Content can be flagged by:
- **Author** (self-declared at upload).
- **Automated scanner** (hash-based detection, heuristic analysis).
- **Community** (players report content; reports become flags after review).
- **Moderator** (manual review and override).
### 6.2 Review Queue
Community and automated flags enter a **review queue**. A moderator either:
- **Approves** the flag (it becomes authoritative), or
- **Rejects** the flag (it is discarded), or
- **Escalates** to a senior moderator for severe/hate flags.
### 6.3 Actions
Once a flag is authoritative, a moderator can take actions:
| Action | Effect |
|-----------------|---------------------------------------------------------------|
| `warn` | Notify the author; content remains. |
| `restrict` | Content hidden from users below a filter threshold. |
| `age_gate` | Content marked `mature`; requires age verification. |
| `remove` | Content taken down; not served. |
| `ban_author` | Author's upload privileges suspended. |
### 6.4 Audit Log
Every flag and action is written to an **audit log**:
```
audit_event (id, content_id, actor_id, action, flag_id, reason, created_at)
```
This log is append-only and used for transparency and dispute resolution.
---
## 7. Client-Side Integration (Godot)
### 7.1 Content Manifest
The server sends each client a **content manifest** — the set of content the
client is permitted to load, derived from the account's verification status and
filter. The Godot client:
- Loads only manifest-listed assets.
- Executes only manifest-listed scripts.
- Shows a **maturity warning** dialog before entering a room whose effective
flags include `mature` content.
### 7.2 Flag Metadata on Content
Each content resource carries a `content_flags` metadata field (a Godot
`Dictionary` or custom `Resource`). The client uses this for local UI decisions
(e.g., showing a warning icon) but **never** as the authority for whether to
load — the server manifest is authoritative.
### 7.3 Age Verification UI
The client exposes an **age verification screen**:
- Tier 1: a date-of-birth picker.
- Tier 2: a button that opens the ID check provider flow (deep link / webview).
The client calls the backend endpoints (§8) and reflects the resulting status.
---
## 8. Backend API Surface
| Method | Path | Description |
|--------|-----------------------------------|------------------------------------------------|
| `POST` | `/v1/age/declare` | Submit self-declared DOB (Tier 1). |
| `POST` | `/v1/age/verify/session` | Create an ID-check session (Tier 2). |
| `POST` | `/v1/age/verify/confirm` | Confirm an ID-check session with a token. |
| `GET` | `/v1/age/status` | Return the account's verification status. |
| `GET` | `/v1/content/{id}/flags` | Return a content item's effective flags. |
| `POST` | `/v1/content/{id}/flags` | Add a flag (author/community). |
| `POST` | `/v1/moderation/review/{flag_id}` | Moderator approve/reject/escalate. |
| `POST` | `/v1/moderation/action` | Apply a moderation action. |
| `GET` | `/v1/manifest` | Return the client's permitted content manifest.|
All endpoints require a valid **JWT** (matching the existing auth stack). The
age endpoints additionally require the account to be in a non-`rejected` state.
---
## 9. Security & Privacy Considerations
- **DOB encryption:** Self-declared birthdates are encrypted at rest; only the
derived age and verification status are used in authorization decisions.
- **No raw identity storage:** The ID check hook persists only a provider
reference and a boolean result.
- **Server authority:** The client manifest prevents bypass; the client never
trusts its own flag metadata for access decisions.
- **Rate limiting:** Age-declaration and ID-check endpoints are rate-limited to
prevent abuse and enumeration.
- **Auditability:** All flag and verification events are logged append-only.
---
## 10. Open Questions / Future Work
- **Regional age thresholds:** Different jurisdictions may require different
minimum ages; the threshold should be configurable per region.
- **Parental controls:** A future feature may let a parent set a content filter
on a minor's account.
- **Automated scanner accuracy:** The heuristic scanner may produce false
positives; a confidence score should be attached to automated flags.
- **Offline / local content:** How flags apply to locally-authored content that
is never uploaded remains to be defined.