docs/testing/test_inventory.md: honest, current list of what automated
coverage actually exists (38 backend pytest tests across 2 files, 0 Godot
tests merged yet) and what doesn't (no integration/endpoint tests at all,
no coverage yet for the in-review RS256/moderation work) -- verified
against a genuinely fresh checkout + fresh Postgres, not just read off the
file tree.
scripts/run_checkpoint_tests.py: runs the whole inventory in one shot --
throwaway Postgres, migrations, pytest, then starts the backend server and
runs every scripts/smoke_test_*.gd against it headlessly. Verified working
both with and without a smoke test present (temporarily tested against
PC1's not-yet-merged scripts/api_client.gd + smoke_test_api.gd, removed
before this commit -- that PR carries its own files).
docs/testing/README.md: what running this at a Package Checkpoint review
does and doesn't prove, and how to grow the inventory as real coverage
gets added.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Verified all three options from the task against Godot 4.6.2 directly
(godot --headless), rather than trusting the probe scripts' own printed
output from earlier sessions:
- ScriptServer doesn't exist as a class; no disable_os/disable_file_access/
disable_network project settings exist either. Nothing to configure.
- SubViewport isolates rendering/input only, not script capabilities — a
script inside one has identical OS/FileAccess/network access.
- Expression is not safe by default (can still reach unsafe methods through
a base instance); blocklisting dangerous substrings is trivially bypassed.
Recommendation: don't sandbox GDScript in-process (nothing to sandbox
with) — use a narrow non-Turing-complete content DSL for the common case,
and OS-level process isolation only if genuinely general scripting turns
out to be required.
claude-checkpoint-tooling
planner-bot
reviewer-bot
architect-bot
agent-bot